Headlines
Home » Why Central Banks’ Policy Split Creates Major Market Risks in 2025

Why Central Banks’ Policy Split Creates Major Market Risks in 2025

The risks of policy divergence between central bank buildings are fueled by geopolitical conflict and climate icons.

Central banks in developed markets now follow very different policy paths, which brings about a financial landscape full of uncertainty for 2025. The Federal Reserve made a big move with a 50-point rate cut, while central banks in Europe and Canada started to cut rates earlier this year. This difference in policies hasn’t caused the expected changes in exchange rates. Instead, steady exchange rates are observed in the markets, which contradicts the predictions of economic theory.

The US dollar remains strong against other currencies, while most major currencies, with the exception of the yen, have also performed well in trade-weighted terms. To grasp what developed market central banks mean is key for investors trying to make sense of this tricky situation. Central bank decisions have created big chances and dangers in interest-rate markets. US 10-year Treasuries now yield 1.8% more than German bonds and 1.6% more than Japanese bonds. How does the central bank manage commercial banks? This question matters a lot as we look at how policy choices affect wider financial systems. In fact, we’re heading into a time with higher interest rates and more inflation where we might not see pre-global financial crisis levels again.

Diverging Central Bank Policies in 2025: A Global Overview

Image Source: FS Investments

However, BoJ Governor Ueda has indicated that hikes could occur if economic conditions improve. Research Team, Financial market analysis team at AInvest

The policy landscape among developed market (DM) central banks has split apart in 2025, creating new challenges for global investors.

Fed’s Hold vs ECB and BoC Rate Cuts

The European Central Bank cut its deposit rate to 2.00% in June 2025, marking its eighth cut in a year. This created a big interest rate gap of over 2 percentage points between Europe and the United States. At the same time, the Fed has kept its federal funds rate between 4.25% and 4.50%, showing a more careful approach. Similarly, the Bank of Canada initiated rate cuts in conjunction with the ECB, reflecting the broader trend of differing monetary policies.

This division comes from different economic situations. The US economy showed strong business growth with a PMI of 55.4 in December 2024, while the Eurozone saw a decline at 49.6. As a result, experts think the ECB will reach a balanced state before the Fed by the end of 2025.

BoJ’s Continued Ultra-loose Policy

Japan shows an even bigger difference with its super-loose money policy. The Bank of Japan kept its policy rate at just 0.5% in May 2025, a level you won’t see in other big economies. Plus, the BOJ cut its GDP growth predictions for FY 2025 by 0.6 percentage points to 0.5%, hinting at ongoing money troubles.

Governor Ueda expressed significant concerns regarding the future of US tax rules. However, food costs and population changes in Japan are causing significant price hikes, prompting the BOJ to gradually tighten monetary policy, albeit at a slower pace than other major banks.

How Does the Central Bank Control the Commercial Banks?

Central banks keep commercial institutions in check through several key methods. They control money supply by buying or selling securities to increase or decrease circulation. Central banks also set liquidity ratios that require commercial banks to maintain specific amounts of their deposits as reserves.

The bank rate—the lowest interest for discounting bills of exchange—is another crucial tool. These methods help central banks pass on monetary policy decisions to commercial banks and then to wider economies. This approach creates a pathway that makes policy differences so important for global markets.

Currency Market Volatility and Exchange Rate Risks

Image Source: DailyForex

The dollar has surprised many in 2025, staying strong even after the Fed started to cut rates. The nominal trade-weighted dollar grew 9.0% by December 2024, gaining 7.7% against advanced economy currencies and 10.3% against emerging market currencies. This unusual toughness comes from the U.S. economy doing better than others, not just from differences in policy.

USD Strength and Trade-weighted Currency Trends

The U.S. real broad effective exchange rate (REER), which shows the dollar’s value adjusted for inflation differences, stays close to its all-time highs. This high value persists due to several key factors. First, the U.S. economy grows faster than other developed markets by a full percentage point. Second, the difference between U.S. 10-year yields and those of trading partners has grown to its widest since 1994. Currently, markets expect the Fed to cut rates by 44 bps in 2025, while they predict 110 bps for the ECB.

Low Exchange Rate Volatility Despite Divergence

Exchange rate volatility has stayed low during this time of policy differences. At first, this goes against normal economic thinking that very different monetary paths would create currency market unrest. This steadiness shows that other main currencies (except the yen) have also been strong in trade-weighted terms. Also forward-looking markets have already factored in much of the difference, with final rate expectations in Europe close to those in the U.S.

Inflation Pass-through from FX Depreciation in Eurozone

Exchange rates have a big impact on euro area inflation through direct and indirect ways. The direct way is through import prices for final consumer goods, while the indirect way is through imported inputs used in domestic production. It’s worth noting that the inflation pass-through from exchange rate depreciation in the Eurozone is about 0.3% for every 1% depreciation, down from 0.8% in 1999. This lower sensitivity comes from the euro area’s low-inflation environment and changes in import composition.

Bond Yield Curves and Spillover Effects

Image Source: European Central Bank – European Union

Yield curves in global bond markets have changed a lot as central banks in developed markets follow different policy paths in 2025. These curves show the link between market pay rates and debt security maturity. They act as key signs of what people expect from the economy and risks that might spread.

Steeper Yield Curves in Europe Due to Early Rate Cuts

The yield curves in Europe have gotten steeper as the ECB’s recent rate cuts take effect. When rates go down, bonds do better, with yields falling as prices go up. Since 1999, the Bloomberg Euro Aggregate Index has given returns of more than 5% on average in the year after ECB rate cuts. Bonds that mature sooner often gain the most from these cuts, as their yields drop more than those of bonds that mature later. For example, the yields on Germany’s 30-year bonds went up by about 40 basis points in early 2025, making curves steeper across the eurozone. This steepening can cause problems for countries with lots of debt, as they have to pay more to issue new bonds.

US Term Premium Risk and Global Spillovers

The extra yield investors want for holding longer-term bonds, known as the term premium, has become a key focus of market risk. Currently, the term premium on 10-year US Treasuries is 0.79%, much lower than what we’ve seen in the past under similar debt conditions. It’s intriguing to note that about a third of unexpected shifts in 10-year yields for Germany and the UK can be linked to surprise changes in US 10-year yields. These effects grew in late 2024 and hit their peak in early 2025. Unlike before, surprises in US economic data now cause reactions abroad that are four times bigger than what we saw in the past ten years. What’s more, US inflation surprises, which didn’t affect advanced economy yields much before 2023, are now big drivers of bond yields worldwide.

How Central Bank Trading Boosts Long-end Yields

Central bank balance sheet policies have a big impact on long-end yields in several ways. When central banks buy government bonds through quantitative easing (QE), it lowers long-term yields. On the flip side, quantitative tightening (QT) does the opposite. Take the Bank of England’s recent QT program, for example. It put £80 billion of bonds back into the market, which pushed up 10-year yields by about 20 basis points. Then there’s Operation Twist. This operation is when central banks buy long-term bonds and sell short-term ones at the same time. It “twists” yield curves by pushing up short-term yields while keeping long-term rates down. Unlike QE, these moves don’t make central bank balance sheets bigger. So, they’re a milder form of stepping into the money market. Overall, the involvement of central banks in trading disrupts the yield curve in ways not associated with traditional policy rate decisions.

Energy Shocks and Geopolitical Risks as Amplifiers

Image Source: jamelsaadaoui.com

Energy market disruptions now make the risks from differing DM central bank policies in 2025 worse. Unlike past economic cycles, today’s changes in commodity prices threaten to have a bigger impact than monetary policy itself.

Imported Inflation from Commodity Price Spikes

US monetary policy significantly influences global commodity prices through various mechanisms, including storage costs, impacts on the real economy, and fluctuations in exchange rates. For the average country, commodity price changes account for about two-thirds of the total spillover effect from US monetary policy on headline inflation, with oil prices alone making up 48%. This situation creates extra challenges for central banks already going in different directions. Eurozone countries are at risk, as a 10-point increase in US rates can lead to a 0.1% drop in Spanish headline CPI because of oil and food price effects.

Geopolitical Tensions and Supply Chain Disruptions

Armed conflicts between nations stand out as the biggest risk in 2025, according to 23% of experts polled by the World Economic Forum. The current Red Sea crisis shows this danger, as it makes shipping companies change their routes to go around Africa through the Cape of Good Hope. This split in the world economy, combined with climate concerns and resource shortages, creates what experts call “a nearly constant crisis state” for global supply chains. Additionally, the frequency of cyberattacks targeting key energy systems is increasing, exacerbating already significant risks.

Why Energy Price Shocks Have More Impact Than Rate Cuts

Price hikes in energy have a bigger impact on consumer prices than drops, creating an uneven effect that makes it harder for central banks to respond. In the eurozone, energy shocks played a big role in the 2022 inflation spike, making up 3 percentage points of the 7-point difference by the end of 2022. So central banks face a tough choice: tightening to fight energy-driven inflation cuts output even more. A big risk to European exchange rates comes from unexpected energy price shocks rather than lower relative interest rates. Moreover, with commodities priced in US dollars, the strength of trade-weighted exchange rates provides minimal protection against imported inflation.

Conclusion

Policy Divergence: A New Era of Market Risk

The gap in monetary policies among developed market central banks creates a risky environment for global markets in 2025 that we haven’t seen before. We’ve looked at how the Federal Reserve’s careful approach differs a lot from the ECB and Bank of Canada’s big rate cuts, while the Bank of Japan keeps its very loose policies.

We see this policy difference most in bond markets, where US 10-year Treasuries now give much higher returns than their German and Japanese counterparts. This means investors face bigger risks from long-term premiums and more effects spilling over. Furthermore, the dollar has stayed strong despite these differences going against what economists expect and creating unusual patterns in the currency market.

What’s most unexpected is how little the exchange rates have moved even with these big policy differences. While this steadiness might look pleasing, it’s hiding pressures that could burst out if things line up just right.

Problems in energy markets and global tensions make these risks even bigger. In particular, when commodity prices jump, it can lead to inflation from imports that overwhelms efforts to control the money supply for countries in Europe that rely on imports. The current crisis in the Red Sea shows how supply chain issues can change economic plans.

Investors need to realize we’re moving into a new age where pre-2008 financial crisis standards might not come back. Central bank policies will stay different through 2025, creating both dangers and chances across different types of investments. The markets that gain or lose the most from these differences will depend on how energy costs and global tensions change along with decisions about money policies.

Individuals who understand the intricate connections between these factors, specifically how US money policy influences global commodity prices and inflation patterns, will be better equipped to navigate this complex situation. Those in the financial markets should get ready for possible big swings in prices as these different policies try to balance out through market forces rather than banks working together.

FAQs

Q1. How are central bank policies differing in 2025?

Central banks are taking different approaches: the Federal Reserve keeps rates the same, while the European Central Bank and Bank of Canada have started to cut rates. The Bank of Japan sticks to a very loose policy. These differences come from varying economic situations in different areas.

Q2. How does policy divergence affect currency markets?

Even with policy differences, currency market swings have stayed low. The US dollar remains strong, while other main currencies (except the yen) have also done well in trade-weighted terms. This steadiness shows that markets have already factored in much of the expected divergence.

Q3. How do these policy differences change bond yield curves?

The ECB’s rate cuts have caused European yield curves to rise. In the US, market risk now centers on the term premium for 10-year Treasuries. These yield curve shifts can affect bond markets worldwide.

Q4. How do energy shocks affect this economic picture?

Energy shocks can make the risks from different central bank policies worse. Price spikes in commodities can lead to inflation in countries that rely on imports. This inflation might overpower efforts to control money supply in economies that depend on imports. When energy prices go up, they often have a bigger impact on what consumers pay than when they go down. This makes it harder for central banks to respond.

Q5. How can investors deal with this tricky situation?

Investors should get ready for possible jumps in market swings as different policies try to balance out. To grasp the links between central bank decisions, raw material costs, and how prices change over time is key. Keep in mind that the way things were before the worldwide money crisis might not come back. Prepare for both risks and opportunities in various investment types.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *